<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smokers&#8217; Lounge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumptionrules.com/smokers-lounge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumptionrules.com/smokers-lounge/</link>
	<description>business, economics, consumer information, current events, politics</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.consumptionrules.com/smokers-lounge/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 07:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumptionrules.com/smokers-lounge/#comment-359</guid>
		<description>Kali, thanks for your research.  A lot of people have asked where it came from.  Perhaps I should change it from 'mural' to 'poster'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kali, thanks for your research.  A lot of people have asked where it came from.  Perhaps I should change it from &#8216;mural&#8217; to &#8216;poster&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kali</title>
		<link>http://www.consumptionrules.com/smokers-lounge/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>Kali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 23:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumptionrules.com/smokers-lounge/#comment-352</guid>
		<description>I tollya! See here:

http://www.snopes.com/photos/advertisements/smokingmural.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tollya! See here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.snopes.com/photos/advertisements/smokingmural.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.snopes.com/photos/advertisements/smokingmural.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kali</title>
		<link>http://www.consumptionrules.com/smokers-lounge/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>Kali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 21:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumptionrules.com/smokers-lounge/#comment-351</guid>
		<description>Uh. I am an artist and I highly doubt that picture is a mural. Photoshop with imagination is more like it.

Final word: 100% FAKE photo.

Nice try, though. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh. I am an artist and I highly doubt that picture is a mural. Photoshop with imagination is more like it.</p>
<p>Final word: 100% FAKE photo.</p>
<p>Nice try, though. <img src='http://www.consumptionrules.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katy</title>
		<link>http://www.consumptionrules.com/smokers-lounge/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Katy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 01:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumptionrules.com/smokers-lounge/#comment-188</guid>
		<description>Quoting from The American Academy of Otolaryngology (Head and Neck Surgery): Secondhand smoke is a combination of the smoke from a burning cigarette and the smoke exhaled by the smoker. Also known as environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), it can be recognized easily by its distinctive odor. ETS contaminates the air and is retained in clothing, curtains and furniture. Many people find ETS unpleasant, annoying, and irritating to the eyes and nose. More importantly, it represents a dangerous health hazard. Over 4,000 different chemicals have been identified in ETS, and at least 43 of these chemicals cause cancer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quoting from The American Academy of Otolaryngology (Head and Neck Surgery): Secondhand smoke is a combination of the smoke from a burning cigarette and the smoke exhaled by the smoker. Also known as environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), it can be recognized easily by its distinctive odor. ETS contaminates the air and is retained in clothing, curtains and furniture. Many people find ETS unpleasant, annoying, and irritating to the eyes and nose. More importantly, it represents a dangerous health hazard. Over 4,000 different chemicals have been identified in ETS, and at least 43 of these chemicals cause cancer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemomori</title>
		<link>http://www.consumptionrules.com/smokers-lounge/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>nemomori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumptionrules.com/smokers-lounge/#comment-173</guid>
		<description>I think its an amusing way to get a point across.  As to Samuel's comment that people shouldn't be smoking inside, claims about the hazards of second hand smoke are vastly overrated.  The one EPA study touted by the cancer groups as proving second hand smoke is a health risk was thrown out by the courts as invalid because it contained hand picked results and gross manipulation of data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its an amusing way to get a point across.  As to Samuel&#8217;s comment that people shouldn&#8217;t be smoking inside, claims about the hazards of second hand smoke are vastly overrated.  The one EPA study touted by the cancer groups as proving second hand smoke is a health risk was thrown out by the courts as invalid because it contained hand picked results and gross manipulation of data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel</title>
		<link>http://www.consumptionrules.com/smokers-lounge/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 01:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumptionrules.com/smokers-lounge/#comment-166</guid>
		<description>Two comments:
1. I don't think they should be smoking inside anyway. 
2. If I were a smoker I would not choose that breakroom to smoke in. I would feel a little self-conscience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two comments:<br />
1. I don&#8217;t think they should be smoking inside anyway.<br />
2. If I were a smoker I would not choose that breakroom to smoke in. I would feel a little self-conscience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: all-encompassingly &#187; Ceiling Mural in Smokers Lounge:: blog</title>
		<link>http://www.consumptionrules.com/smokers-lounge/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>all-encompassingly &#187; Ceiling Mural in Smokers Lounge:: blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 04:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumptionrules.com/smokers-lounge/#comment-162</guid>
		<description>[...] A giant mural that covers the ceiling of a smokers lounge. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A giant mural that covers the ceiling of a smokers lounge. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
